yade-dev team mailing list archive

["Eulitz, Alexander" <Alexander.Eulitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi guys,
I would really miss such a functionality.
cheers
Alex
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Yade-dev [mailto:yade-dev-bounces+alexander.eulitz=iwf.tu-berlin.de@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Bruno Chareyre
Gesendet: Freitag, 3. Juli 2015 12:32
An: yade-dev
Betreff: Re: [Yade-dev] [Yade-users] [Question #268476]: Prallel Computation, CentOS & Ubuntu file versions

On 03/07/15 12:00, Anton Gladky wrote:
> 2015-07-03 9:26 GMT+02:00 Bruno Chareyre <bruno.chareyre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>> I am just thinking, that we should probably deprecate this 
>>> functionality, because it usually brings only problems.
>> Deprecating save()?!
> I was thinking about implementing something more simple to save 
> simulations. For example, only bodies, velocities and maybe interactions.
> Thus it could be more portable. AFAIK such a scheme is in LAMMPS.
Why not but it will not replace the current save() for resuming simulations as if they were not interrupted.
Without proper engines, a list of bodies and interactions is useless.
B


_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev
Post to     : yade-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp