yade-dev team mailing list archive

[Bruno Chareyre <bruno.chareyre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Jérôme,
I don't see what you mean, sorry.
Setting unp=un is explicitely making current state the equilibrium state,
without the need of any additional "trick", else please explain why you
think it is not enough.
Handling modified normals (second specific feature) is the job of Ig2
functor, not Law functor.
So overall I think the law you mention is really redundant.

Let me know what you think about this. We should reach consensus about such
things, else users are all confused by different replies.
Thanks

Bruno


On 28 July 2015 at 21:36, Jérôme Duriez <
question269724@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Question #269724 on Yade changed:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/269724
>
> Jérôme Duriez posted a new comment:
> Yes Bruno, I know this "trick" too, which may require one or two more
> lines than the one you quote (see
> https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/266828, #4 especially).
>
> Yade suffers probably from having too many laws, but as for
> Law2_ScGeom_JCFpmPhys_JointedCohesiveFrictionalPM, I do not think this
> not so interesting discussion may conclude it is not justified, since I
> mentioned earlier a second specific feature about the discontinuity
> contacts.....
>
> --
> You received this question notification because you are a member of
> yade-users, which is an answer contact for Yade.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-users
> Post to     : yade-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-users
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>