yade-dev team mailing list archive

[Bruno Chareyre <bruno.chareyre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

@Jérôme
The link is that Software Carpentry is very much related to software
development in research and the related issues (quality control, citation
format, academic recognition, and many others beyhond the strictly
technical aspects). It is less obvious with their new homepage.

It is an entry point for many interesting discussions (random examples
below).
It has great content for teaching to.
Bruno

http://carver.cs.ua.edu/Papers/Journal/2015/SLR-Science_preprint.pdf
http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1001745
http://software.ac.uk/so-exactly-what-software-did-you-use



On 2 October 2015 at 18:55, Jerome Duriez <Jerome.Duriez@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> With some delay, and out of curiosity, what link do you draw between this
> software-carpentry <https://software-carpentry.org/> (I understood as an
> association helping researchers to deal with their computing tools) and the
> journal softwarex (where YADE could be presented ?)
>
> I could not get it..
>
> Jerome
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Yade-dev [yade-dev-bounces+jerome.duriez=
> ucalgary.ca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] on behalf of Bruno Chareyre [
> bruno.chareyre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *Sent:* September 22, 2015 4:20 PM
> *To:* Yade developers
> *Subject:* Re: [Yade-dev] SoftwareX
>
> I must mention that Jan's note is closely linked, in my brain, to a
> discussion I had with a developper of Plaxis, who suggested [1] as a
> relevant link.
> B
>
> [1] https://software-carpentry.org/
>
> On 22 September 2015 at 17:37, Bruno Chareyre <
> bruno.chareyre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Very interesting initiative.
>> As it turns out I've been reviewer for a paper in MethodsX[1] recently, a
>> journal based on a very similar idea.
>> MethodsX is supposed to be oriented toward experimental methods, but it
>> appears that they also publish programming things.
>> Ultimately, I guess SoftwareX aims at attracting the computational papers
>> which currently go to MethodsX.
>> Looking at [2] I see quite unusual content compared to classical journal
>> papers. Something to keep in mind. Thanks Jan.
>> Bruno
>>
>>
>> [1] http://www.journals.elsevier.com/methodsx
>> [2] http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352711015000035
>>
>> On 17/09/15 14:35, Jan Stránský wrote:
>>
>> Hello all,
>> recently I have found links bellow, might be useful for the discussion
>> how to cite Yade in future and for newer versions. Mainly sent not to
>> forget completely :-)
>> cheers
>> Jan
>>
>> [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l1cWoHKCBak
>> [2] http://www.journals.elsevier.com/softwarex
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev
>> Post to     : yade-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev
>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> _______________
>> Bruno Chareyre
>> Associate Professor
>> ENSE³ - Grenoble INP
>> Lab. 3SR
>> BP 53
>> 38041 Grenoble cedex 9
>> Tél : +33 4 56 52 86 21
>> Fax : +33 4 76 82 70 43
>> ________________
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev
>> Post to     : yade-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev
>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev
> Post to     : yade-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>