yade-dev team mailing list archive
-
yade-dev team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #12638
Re: Yade release, new versioning?
-
To:
yade-dev <yade-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-
From:
Jerome Duriez <Jerome.Duriez@xxxxxxxxxxx>
-
Date:
Wed, 20 Apr 2016 16:05:55 +0000
-
Accept-language:
en-CA, en-US
-
Authentication-results:
spf=pass (sender IP is 136.159.160.216) smtp.mailfrom=ucalgary.ca; lists.launchpad.net; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;lists.launchpad.net; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=ucalgary.ca;
-
In-reply-to:
<CALF6qJ=L51cEgzLLcLc+YWdYCNM6rng7jccQ41DoiYDM+5e6Cw@mail.gmail.com>
-
Spamdiagnosticmetadata:
NSPM
-
Spamdiagnosticoutput:
1:23
-
Thread-index:
AQHRmngEFRFYO1ikiEWwZ/oJhQseS5+TB48Q
-
Thread-topic:
[Yade-dev] Yade release, new versioning?
This new kind of versioning would definitively sound more meaningful (to me at least).
As for the 2 or 4 year digits, assuming Yade will last one century is a far reach ! ;-)
Jerome
________________________________
From: Yade-dev [yade-dev-bounces+jerome.duriez=ucalgary.ca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] on behalf of Anton Gladky [gladky.anton@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: April-19-16 2:13 PM
To: yade-dev
Subject: [Yade-dev] Yade release, new versioning?
Dear all,
I am planning to release new Yade version soon, because
the 1.20.0 was released about 6 months ago and we have
over 120 commits now.
Some projects now are using the following versioning for
releases: YYYY.MM<http://YYYY.MM> (i.e. 2016.04). Do we want to adopt
such a system?
I think this versioning is better in comparison to our numbering,
because it includes the information about release time.
Looking forward for your comments.
Best regards
Anton
Follow ups
References
