yade-dev team mailing list archive

["Eulitz, Alexander" <Alexander.Eulitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Dear all,

I totally agree with YYYY.MM

regards

Alex

 

Von: Yade-dev
[mailto:yade-dev-bounces+alexander.eulitz=iwf.tu-berlin.de@lists.launchp
ad.net] Im Auftrag von Jerome Duriez
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 20. April 2016 18:06
An: yade-dev
Betreff: Re: [Yade-dev] Yade release, new versioning?

 

This new kind of versioning would definitively sound more meaningful (to
me at least).

As for the 2 or 4 year digits, assuming Yade will last one century is a
far reach ! ;-)


Jerome

________________________________

From: Yade-dev
[yade-dev-bounces+jerome.duriez=ucalgary.ca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] on
behalf of Anton Gladky [gladky.anton@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: April-19-16 2:13 PM
To: yade-dev
Subject: [Yade-dev] Yade release, new versioning?

Dear all, 

 

I am planning to release new Yade version soon, because

the 1.20.0 was released about 6 months ago and we have

over 120 commits now.

 

Some projects now are using the following versioning for 

releases: YYYY.MM (i.e. 2016.04). Do we want to adopt

such a system?

 

I think this versioning is better in comparison to our numbering,

because it includes the information about release time.

 

Looking forward for your comments.

 

Best regards


Anton