← Back to team overview

yade-dev team mailing list archive

Re: YADE_SPH

 

My impression was that isActive was used in these functors in relation with some SPH coupling. Maybe not.
For the rest, yes, there are marco-guards.
Who would be a contact person for the SPH thing? Only you were working on it as far as I know. No emergency of any sort, just curious about what can happen on this side.
Bruno

On 04/04/2017 08:02 PM, Anton Gladky wrote:
Hi Bruno,

I have no information whether it is planned to develop it further
and whether somebody is using it. As far as I remember, all
SPH-relevant changes are guarded by the YADE_SPH
macroses.

It looks like isActive is used also in ViscoelasticPM and LudingPM and
ViscoelasticCapillarPM.

Best regards

Anton


2017-04-04 11:55 GMT+02:00 Bruno Chareyre <bruno.chareyre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
Dear Anton,
Could you tell us the status of the YADE_SPH feature and if there is a
chance to see it further developed?
I incidentally found an attribute which seems to be used exlusively for that
purpose (here below), so I'm now wondering.  :)
Bruno

class Interaction: public Serializable{
         ...
         bool isActive;

--
_______________
Bruno Chareyre
Associate Professor
ENSE³ - Grenoble INP
Lab. 3SR
BP 53
38041 Grenoble cedex 9
Tél : +33 4 56 52 86 21
Fax : +33 4 76 82 70 43
________________

Email too brief?
Here's why! http://emailcharter.org



_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev
Post to     : yade-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

--
_______________
Bruno Chareyre
Associate Professor
ENSE³ - Grenoble INP
Lab. 3SR
BP 53
38041 Grenoble cedex 9
Tél : +33 4 56 52 86 21
Fax : +33 4 76 82 70 43
________________

Email too brief?
Here's why! http://emailcharter.org




Follow ups

References