yade-dev team mailing list archive
-
yade-dev team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #13057
Re: YADE_SPH
My impression was that isActive was used in these functors in relation
with some SPH coupling. Maybe not.
For the rest, yes, there are marco-guards.
Who would be a contact person for the SPH thing? Only you were working
on it as far as I know. No emergency of any sort, just curious about
what can happen on this side.
Bruno
On 04/04/2017 08:02 PM, Anton Gladky wrote:
Hi Bruno,
I have no information whether it is planned to develop it further
and whether somebody is using it. As far as I remember, all
SPH-relevant changes are guarded by the YADE_SPH
macroses.
It looks like isActive is used also in ViscoelasticPM and LudingPM and
ViscoelasticCapillarPM.
Best regards
Anton
2017-04-04 11:55 GMT+02:00 Bruno Chareyre <bruno.chareyre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
Dear Anton,
Could you tell us the status of the YADE_SPH feature and if there is a
chance to see it further developed?
I incidentally found an attribute which seems to be used exlusively for that
purpose (here below), so I'm now wondering. :)
Bruno
class Interaction: public Serializable{
...
bool isActive;
--
_______________
Bruno Chareyre
Associate Professor
ENSE³ - Grenoble INP
Lab. 3SR
BP 53
38041 Grenoble cedex 9
Tél : +33 4 56 52 86 21
Fax : +33 4 76 82 70 43
________________
Email too brief?
Here's why! http://emailcharter.org
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev
Post to : yade-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
--
_______________
Bruno Chareyre
Associate Professor
ENSE³ - Grenoble INP
Lab. 3SR
BP 53
38041 Grenoble cedex 9
Tél : +33 4 56 52 86 21
Fax : +33 4 76 82 70 43
________________
Email too brief?
Here's why! http://emailcharter.org
Follow ups
References