yade-dev team mailing list archive
-
yade-dev team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #14049
Re: Removal of TranslationEngine
Hi Jan, thx for reaction. I agree that on/off for multiple bodies is
convenient.
Then maybe only example should be touched? I wonder what leads users to
translation engine while iirc the general doc describes controlling DOFs
properly.
B
Le sam. 28 juil. 2018 09:19, Jan Stránský <honzik.stransky@xxxxxxxxx> a
écrit :
> Hi Bruno,
>
> answering here not to pollute the original question [1].
>
> You can impose the velocity of the piston as b.state.vel=(x,y,z) after
>> setting b.state.blockedDOFs='xyzXYZ'. You then make it zero in the begining
>> and change for something else at some point.
>> TranslationEngine makes this simple thing excessively complex in my
>> opinion. I would suggest to forget it (*).
>> Bruno
>> (*) and even to remove it from source code for its anti-didactic effect,
>> to keep only truly involved helico-rotational motion engines present
>
>
> I agree that for single body / a few bodies, blockedDOFs + setting vel is
> much more easier and that TranslationEngine has anti-didactic effect.
>
> I disagree with removing it from source code (if you don't mean just
> examples, there yes). TranslationEngine is IMO more appropriate for
> multiple bodies. You can also use dead=True/False easily etc.
> Also it is useful for CombinedKinematicEngine (although a new very general
> kinematic engine altering current functionality could be implemented).
>
> cheers
> Jan
>
> [1] https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/671132
>
>
References