Hi Bruno,
sorry for late answer, during Christmas I totally forgot about the
topic :-)
yes, reading it once more, it sounds contradictory.. but anyway it
make sense to me and I am sure there are words that would
explain/define it better..
apparently the topic would deserve something like FAQ [1] :-)
Jan
[1] https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/678055
út 18. 12. 2018 v 20:07 odesílatel Bruno Chareyre
<bruno.chareyre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:bruno.chareyre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> napsal:
Le mar. 18 déc. 2018 16:37, Jan Stránský
<honzik.stransky@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:honzik.stransky@xxxxxxxxx>> a
écrit :
see my previous (slightly modified):
- assuming the particles rigid
- computing the force under assumption that in reality there
would be no overlap and some deformation.
This is self contradictory, no? What would be a model where you
assume the contrary of what you consider reality and expected result?!
By this statement you are efficiently killing the rigid
assumption. Obviously it doesn't fit in the general picture and it
it is useless.
Bruno
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev
Post to : yade-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp