yade-pkg team mailing list archive
-
yade-pkg team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00061
Re: [Build #2051994] amd64 build of yade-0.60 rc1~lucid1 in ubuntu lucid RELEASE (yade-pkg-stable PPA)
Strange, but snapshots were built yesterday very quickly on Launchpad.
Anton
2010/11/18 Václav Šmilauer <eu@xxxxxxxx>
>
> * State: Failed to build
>> * Duration: 2 hours 40 minutes
>> * Build Log:
>> https://launchpad.net/~yade-pkg/+archive/stable/+build/2051994/+files/buildlog_ubuntu-lucid-amd64.yade-0.60_rc1%7Elucid1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz<https://launchpad.net/%7Eyade-pkg/+archive/stable/+build/2051994/+files/buildlog_ubuntu-lucid-amd64.yade-0.60_rc1%7Elucid1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz>
>>
> That's enough. I changed the compiler to be clang instead of gcc (only in
> the 0.60 branch). I am testing the package now. The packaged version will
> lack OpenMP, no big deal. Once we can build package at yade-dem.org proper
> with more RAM, we might switch back to gcc (Remi, is this going to be
> possible? It is just a question, I don't want you overloaded :-|)
>
> I incremented chukSize to 5 in debian/control, but you can go down if you
> think it is too much. Peak RAM usage I noticed was around 2.4GB.
>
> The strange thing is that if was built just fine using fakeroot
> debian/rules binary from the source tree, but running the compilation in
> pbuilder failed (no clear error message, something strange from clang;
> perhaps it was just the RAMdisk that was full)
>
> Cheers, v.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-pkg<https://launchpad.net/%7Eyade-pkg>
> Post to : yade-pkg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-pkg<https://launchpad.net/%7Eyade-pkg>
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
References