| Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |
Hello, I have counted all votes. Including votes from people who voted only for a single name (I assumed they give 0 for all other names). The votes from each person are listed here: http://beta.arcig.cz/~eudoxos/phd/index.cgi/YaDe/NewNameSuggestions I double checked so I hope that I made no mistake when counting votes from each person. But you can check your votes anyway. The top names are: 69 | YADE-*** | 56 | Yade | current name. You can vote for that too. 40 | OpenDEM / FEM / etc ... | the Open source Discrete and Explicit/Element Method 30 | Obsidian | O(b)pen S(i)oftware for D(i)ynamic ANalysis. 28 | OpenDEM+ | "Open DEM Plus" - more than just DEM 27 | Opsidyan | open software in dynamic analysis 25 | Nodem | Not Only Discrete Element Method 23 | Sweet | Scientific Workbench for Explicit Engineering Theories 23 | Odyssee | Open DYnamic Simulation Software for various Element 21 | Eos | Extensible Open Simulation 20 | Pyrite | 20 | Odin | Open Dynamic computatIoN platform 17 | Edy | explicit dynamics 17 | Skarn | Conclusions: 1. We use the old name: YADE 2. We call each package 'Open DEM', 'Open FEM', etc... so that google will catch the word 'Open' Previousy I thought about calling each package just DEM and FEM. But it looks like adding a prefix "Open" is preferred by many people: it is 2nd place in the voting! So let it be :) I'm sure that if voting for names was done 2 years ago, we would have something completely different. But now, this project has some history so we stick with the old name. Yes - I added OpenFEM to the OpenDEM option: I think it is the only reasonable thing to do, because YADE handles FEM too. I'm looking forward for your comments about the results. -- # Janek Kozicki _______________________________________________ Yade-users mailing list Yade-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/yade-users
| Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |
