yade-users team mailing list archive
-
yade-users team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00746
Re: reference sphere assembly
Aditional remark : the TriaxialTest can generate the packing THEN
perform compression/traction test. You don't need to save/reload the
simulation.
Bruno
SHIU wenjie a écrit :
> Hi Vaclav,
>
> I did get some pre-generated numerical specimens for uniaxial test and
> triaxial test. I can send you some files later!!! Or you can even make the
> specimen by yourself! I can explain the way that i use to do the "specimen
> generation".
>
> I take the Triaxialtest as an example base, i just add some changes in this
> class.
> You can start from the radii expansion process to get a sphere assembly with
> isotropic property. When the stability criteria is satisfied, saving the
> position and the radius of all the spheres. And the specimen generation is
> done!! Be care about the ratio between the stiffness of the spheres and the
> target confinement.
>
>
> How many spheres should we use?? Well, you can take 10000 spheres if you get
> a powerful PC. Indeed, i did some uniaxial simulations, and i did not get
> the size effect (between 2400 to 8000 spheres)!!
>
> And the problem about the dilatance when runing the triaxial test, I am
> still trying to find out a solution!! It could be caused by the constitutive
> law or many other factors!!!
>
> Regards
>
> wenjie
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Václav Smilauer" <eudoxos@xxxxxxxx>
> To: <yade-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 1:21 PM
> Subject: [Yade-users] reference sphere assembly
>
>
>
>> I would like to calibrate material parameters to match macroscopic
>> properties using uniaxial traction and later triaxial compression tests.
>> Is there some widely used, pre-generated sphere assmebly that has
>> properties such as isotropy and "reasonable" radii variance that could
>> be used? (Something like that should be part of Yade, I think).
>>
>> If no, what procedures to you recommend to create such assembly? How
>> many sphere should I go for?
>>
>> I will work soon on triax test which will have "true" hydrostatic
>> confinement (by using delaunay to detect the solid edge and applying
>> forces at relevant spheres) - that will solve the problem of restricted
>> dilatance for triax (right, Wenjie?).
>>
>> Regards, Vaclav
>> _______________________________________________
>> Yade-users mailing list
>> Yade-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/yade-users
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Yade-users mailing list
> Yade-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/yade-users
>
>
--
_______________
Chareyre Bruno
Maitre de conference
Institut National Polytechnique de Grenoble
Laboratoire 3S (Soils Solids Structures) - bureau E145
BP 53 - 38041, Grenoble cedex 9 - France
Tél : 33 4 56 52 86 21
Fax : 33 4 76 82 70 00
________________
_______________________________________________
Yade-users mailing list
Yade-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/yade-users
References