yade-users team mailing list archive
-
yade-users team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #03467
Re: hello? -help with a spinning bucket!
you got it! some bead-time reading for me.. ;-)
hey, just put the two's together and appreciated that you folks are the founders and core developers.. seriously, thank's for your feedback!
-mike :-D
--- On Thu, 7/8/10, Bruno Chareyre <bruno.chareyre@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Bruno Chareyre <bruno.chareyre@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Yade-users] hello? -help with a spinning bucket!
To: yade-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Received: Thursday, July 8, 2010, 2:48 PM
This is a well-know issue in explicit methods. Fortunately, Vaclav
wrote a chapter on this for the case of DEM. :-)
https://www.yade-dem.org/sphinx/formulation.html#stability-considerations
Bruno
On 08/07/10 20:35, Michael Jensen wrote:
might I ask how you know if your timestep is too large?
do you compare your results with experiment? or are there funky
results that you have learned to associate with time steps that are too
big?
--- On Thu, 7/8/10, Anton Gladky <gladky.anton@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
From: Anton Gladky <gladky.anton@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Yade-users] hello? -help with a spinning bucket!
To: yade-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Received: Thursday, July 8, 2010, 2:10 PM
Hi,
this is a more-less normal time step for simulations.
Sometimes I have to do:
O.dt = 0.1*pWavetimestep
2010/7/8 Michael Jensen <jenmichael2000@xxxxxxxx>
one thing that I would be particularly interested in is
how the formula on this page:
https://www.yade-dem.org/sphinx/yade.utils.html#yade.utils.PWaveTimeStep
for spherepwavetimestep is computed.
2.8284271247461903e-07 is a very small number, meaning a huge
number of iterations are required (almost 10 million) before a=20
single second goes by in the simulation. that's a hell of a lot
of iterations! for one second! is it really necessary?
-mike..
--- On Thu, 7/8/10, Bruno Chareyre <bruno.chareyre@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
From: Bruno Chareyre <bruno.chareyre@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Yade-users] hello? -help with a spinning bucket!
To: yade-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Received: Thursday, July 8, 2010, 10:13 AM
It seems to me that if I put some beads into a container,
then tip the container, the angle at which they start flowing is the
angle of internal friction.. I am not at all sure of this, it seems
far to simple.
Not really. Angle of repose corresponds to "internal packing friction",
which "depends on" contact friction but is not equal.
Most materials have contact friction around 30°. Put this value at
contact in a loose sphere packing and you will get an internal friction
around 18°.
Anyway, you should get realistic results as soon as you define a decent
friction (say between 10 and 40), this is not a crucial parameter yet.
Bruno
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-users
Post to : yade-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-users
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-users
Post to : yade-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-users
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-users
Post to : yade-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-users
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-users
Post to : yade-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-users
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-users
Post to : yade-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-users
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
References