yade-users team mailing list archive

1. yade-users team
2. Mailing list archive
3. Messages by thread

Messages by thread

Messages sent to the yade-users mailing list, ordered by thread from the newest to oldest.

• Re: [Question #700308]: Compile 2022.01a against Python 3.10 Failed on Archlinux, (continued)
  • Re: [Question #700308]: Compile 2022.01a against Python 3.10 Failed on Archlinux
    From: Kan Su, 2022-01-20
  • Re: [Question #700308]: Compile 2022.01a against Python 3.10 Failed on Archlinux
    From: Launchpad Janitor, 2022-02-04
• [Question #700308]: Compile 2022.01a against Python 3.10 Failed on Archlinux
  From: Kan Su, 2022-01-20
• [Question #700306]: Calculation of cohesive force between the clump particle
  From: Yimsk, 2022-01-20
• Re: [Question #700186]: Maximum strain rate in a triaxial test
  From: Fabio, 2022-01-19
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #700186]: Maximum strain rate in a triaxial test
  From: Alice Ezzeddine, 2022-01-20
• Re: [Question #700186]: Maximum strain rate in a triaxial test
  From: Ernest, 2022-01-20
• Re: [Question #700297]: How to get particle displacement in VTK？
  From: Jan Stránský, 2022-01-19
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #700297]: How to get particle displacement in VTK？
  From: Xue, 2022-01-19
• [Question #700297]: How to get particle displacement in VTK？
  From: Xue, 2022-01-19
• Re: [Question #700290]: What packaging is used for sand pebbles?
  From: Jan Stránský, 2022-01-19
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #700290]: What packaging is used for sand pebbles?
  From: Launchpad Janitor, 2022-02-04
• [Question #700290]: What packaging is used for sand pebbles?
  From: 孙灿, 2022-01-19
• [Question #700285]: Why my fluid-solid coupling script run so slowly
  From: Ziyu Wang, 2022-01-18
• Re: [Question #700276]: Detailed description of recording information with VTKRecorder
  From: Jan Stránský, 2022-01-18
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #700276]: Detailed description of recording information with VTKRecorder
  From: Ziyu Wang, 2022-01-22
• Re: [Question #700271]: Rotational Kinetic Energy
  From: Jan Stránský, 2022-01-18
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #700271]: Rotational Kinetic Energy
  From: Zekeriya Metehan Karslioglu, 2022-01-19
• [Question #700276]: Detailed description of recording information with VTKRecorder
  From: Ziyu Wang, 2022-01-18
• [Question #700275]: Using paraview to present the shape of fracture surface
  From: Ziyu Wang, 2022-01-18
• Re: [Question #700274]: Facet in the model disappears
  From: Xue, 2022-01-18
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #700274]: Facet in the model disappears
  From: Karol Brzezinski, 2022-01-18
• Re: [Question #700274]: Facet in the model disappears
  From: Xue, 2022-01-18
• [Question #700274]: Facet in the model disappears
  From: Xue, 2022-01-18
• [Question #700271]: Rotational Kinetic Energy
  From: Zekeriya Metehan Karslioglu, 2022-01-17
• Re: [Question #700258]: How to involve adhesionForce in Hertz-Mindlin contact model
  From: Karol Brzezinski, 2022-01-17
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #700258]: How to involve adhesionForce in Hertz-Mindlin contact model
  From: Leonard, 2022-01-18
• Re: [Question #700258]: How to involve adhesionForce in Hertz-Mindlin contact model
  From: Karol Brzezinski, 2022-01-19
• Re: [Question #700258]: How to involve adhesionForce in Hertz-Mindlin contact model
  From: Leonard, 2022-01-19
• Re: [Question #700258]: How to involve adhesionForce in Hertz-Mindlin contact model
  From: Leonard, 2022-01-19
• Re: [Question #700260]: Any example for rock solid-fluid coupling triax?
  From: Robert Caulk, 2022-01-17
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #700260]: Any example for rock solid-fluid coupling triax?
  From: Ziyu Wang, 2022-01-17
• Re: [Question #700260]: Any example for rock solid-fluid coupling triax?
  From: Ziyu Wang, 2022-01-18
• Re: [Question #700260]: Any example for rock solid-fluid coupling triax?
  From: Launchpad Janitor, 2022-02-03
• [Question #700260]: Any example for rock solid-fluid coupling triax?
  From: Ziyu Wang, 2022-01-17
• [Question #700258]: How to involve adhesionForce in Hertz-Mindlin contact model
  From: Leonard, 2022-01-16
• Yade 2022.01a released
  From: Anton Gladky, 2022-01-16
• [Question #700213]: PeriTriaxController not initiating next stage
  From: Danny (Dingeman) van der Haven, 2022-01-13
• Re: [Question #700030]: When using the Hertz contact model, the consolidation can not be achieved
  From: Launchpad Janitor, 2022-01-13
• Re: [Question #700199]: Surface area and overlap
  From: Karol Brzezinski, 2022-01-12
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #700199]: Surface area and overlap
  From: Jan Stránský, 2022-01-13
• Re: [Question #700199]: Surface area and overlap
  From: Mithushan Soundaranathan, 2022-01-14
• Re: [Question #700199]: Surface area and overlap
  From: Jan Stránský, 2022-01-14
• Re: [Question #700199]: Surface area and overlap
  From: Jan Stránský, 2022-01-14
• Re: [Question #700199]: Surface area and overlap
  From: Bret Ritchie, 2022-03-30
• [Question #700199]: Surface area and overlap
  From: Mithushan Soundaranathan, 2022-01-12
• Re: [Question #700192]: Autosave
  From: Jan Stránský, 2022-01-12
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #700192]: Autosave
  From: Przemek, 2022-01-12
• Re: [Question #700192]: Autosave
  From: Jan Stránský, 2022-01-13
• Re: [Question #700192]: Autosave
  From: Przemek, 2022-01-13
• [Question #700192]: Autosave
  From: Przemek, 2022-01-12
• Re: [Question #700188]: How to set the value of cutoff in Utica.avgNumInteractions
  From: Xin Li, 2022-01-12
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #700188]: How to set the value of cutoff in Utica.avgNumInteractions
  From: Jan Stránský, 2022-01-12
• Re: [Question #700188]: How to set the value of cutoff in Utica.avgNumInteractions
  From: Xin Li, 2022-01-12
• [Question #700188]: How to get stress tensor within non-cubic boundaries
  From: Xin Li, 2022-01-11
• [Question #700186]: Maximum strain rate in a triaxial test
  From: Alice Ezzeddine, 2022-01-11
• [Question #700181]: Is there a way to get energy dissipated from one particular set of contacts ?
  From: Antoine FAULCONNIER, 2022-01-11
• Re: [Question #700165]: Functions in FEM-DEM
  From: Jan Stránský, 2022-01-11
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #700165]: Functions in FEM-DEM
  From: Nima Goudarzi, 2022-01-11
• Re: [Question #700165]: Functions in FEM-DEM
  From: Jan Stránský, 2022-01-12
• Re: [Question #700165]: Functions in FEM-DEM
  From: Nima Goudarzi, 2022-01-12
• Re: [Question #700165]: Functions in FEM-DEM
  From: Jan Stránský, 2022-01-13
• [Question #700165]: Functions in FEM-DEM
  From: Nima Goudarzi, 2022-01-10
• [Question #700164]: External Moving Object using MPI
  From: Nima Goudarzi, 2022-01-10
• Re: [Question #700144]: Problems in yade and oofem triaxial test simulations
  From: Jan Stránský, 2022-01-10
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #700144]: Problems in yade and oofem triaxial test simulations
  From: Xue, 2022-01-12
• Re: [Question #700143]: Uniaxial compression calibration parameters are not applicable to triaxial compression
  From: Jan Stránský, 2022-01-10
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #700143]: Uniaxial compression calibration parameters are not applicable to triaxial compression
  From: Jan Stránský, 2022-01-10
• Re: [Question #700143]: Uniaxial compression calibration parameters are not applicable to triaxial compression
  From: Ziyu Wang, 2022-01-11
• Re: [Question #700143]: Uniaxial compression calibration parameters are not applicable to triaxial compression
  From: Luc Scholtès, 2022-01-11
• Re: [Question #700143]: Uniaxial compression calibration parameters are not applicable to triaxial compression
  From: Ziyu Wang, 2022-01-17
• [Question #700144]: Problems in yade and oofem triaxial test simulations
  From: Xue, 2022-01-09
• [Question #700143]: Uniaxial compression calibration parameters are not applicable to triaxial compression
  From: Ziyu Wang, 2022-01-09
• Re: [Question #700119]: 2PFV Drainage
  From: Luis Barbosa, 2022-01-08
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #700119]: 2PFV Drainage
  From: Luis Barbosa, 2022-01-12
• Re: [Question #700119]: 2PFV Drainage
  From: Launchpad Janitor, 2022-01-24
• [Question #700119]: 2PFV Drainage
  From: Luis Barbosa, 2022-01-07
• Re: [Question #700102]: getSaturation - 2PFV
  From: Bruno Chareyre, 2022-01-06
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #700102]: getSaturation - 2PFV
  From: Luis Barbosa, 2022-01-07
• Re: [Question #700102]: getSaturation - 2PFV
  From: Luis Barbosa, 2022-01-07
• [Question #700102]: getSaturation - 2PFV
  From: Luis Barbosa, 2022-01-06
• Re: [Question #700031]: postprocessing data with tassellationWrapper
  From: Marco Previtali, 2021-12-28
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #700031]: postprocessing data with tassellationWrapper
  From: Marco Previtali, 2021-12-28
• Re: [Question #700031]: postprocessing data with tassellationWrapper
  From: Marco Previtali, 2021-12-28
• Re: [Question #700031]: postprocessing data with tassellationWrapper
  From: Karol Brzezinski, 2021-12-28
• Re: [Question #700031]: postprocessing data with tassellationWrapper
  From: Marco Previtali, 2021-12-28
• Re: [Question #700031]: postprocessing data with tassellationWrapper
  From: Karol Brzezinski, 2021-12-29
• Re: [Question #700031]: postprocessing data with tassellationWrapper
  From: Marco Previtali, 2021-12-29
• Re: [Question #700031]: postprocessing data with tassellationWrapper
  From: Marco Previtali, 2021-12-30
• Re: [Question #700031]: postprocessing data with tassellationWrapper
  From: Karol Brzezinski, 2021-12-30
• Re: [Question #700031]: postprocessing data with tassellationWrapper
  From: Bruno Chareyre, 2022-01-06
• Re: [Question #700031]: postprocessing data with tassellationWrapper
  From: Marco Previtali, 2022-01-06
• [Question #700031]: postprocessing data with tassellationWrapper
  From: Marco Previtali, 2021-12-28
• [Question #700030]: When using the Hertz contact model, the consolidation can not be achieved
  From: Zhicheng Gao, 2021-12-28
• Re: [Question #700022]: where shearForce in Law2_ScGeom_FrictPhys_CundallStrack is updated?
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-12-28
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #700022]: where shearForce in Law2_ScGeom_FrictPhys_CundallStrack is updated?
  From: gansu zhang, 2021-12-28
• Re: [Question #700022]: where shearForce in Law2_ScGeom_FrictPhys_CundallStrack is updated?
  From: gansu zhang, 2021-12-28
• [Question #700022]: where shearForce in Law2_ScGeom_FrictPhys_CundallStrack is updated?
  From: gansu zhang, 2021-12-28
• Re: [Question #700004]: What is non-dynamic body
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-12-27
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #700004]: What is non-dynamic body
  From: Leonard, 2021-12-28
• [Question #700004]: What is non-dynamic body
  From: Leonard, 2021-12-27
• Re: [Question #699997]: Two phase flow engine
  From: Hossein, 2021-12-27
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #699997]: Two phase flow engine
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-12-27
• Re: [Question #699997]: Two phase flow engine
  From: Hossein, 2021-12-29
• Re: [Question #699998]: How to simulate small-strain triaxial compression test
  From: Leonard, 2021-12-26
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #699998]: How to simulate small-strain triaxial compression test
  From: Jérôme Duriez, 2022-01-05
• Re: [Question #699998]: How to simulate small-strain triaxial compression test
  From: Leonard, 2022-01-06
• Re: [Question #699998]: How to simulate small-strain triaxial compression test
  From: Bruno Chareyre, 2022-01-06
• [Question #699998]: How to simulate small-strain triaxial compression test
  From: Leonard, 2021-12-26
• [Question #699997]: Two phase flow engine
  From: Hossein, 2021-12-26
• Re: [Question #699960]: yade::InteractionLoop::action(): assumption ‘!swap’ failure
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-12-22
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #699960]: yade::InteractionLoop::action(): assumption ‘!swap’ failure
  From: Xue, 2021-12-22
• Re: [Question #699960]: yade::InteractionLoop::action(): assumption ‘!swap’ failure
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-12-22
• Re: [Question #699960]: yade::InteractionLoop::action(): assumption ‘!swap’ failure
  From: Xue, 2021-12-24
• Re: [Question #699960]: yade::InteractionLoop::action(): assumption ‘!swap’ failure
  From: Xue, 2021-12-24
• [Question #699960]: yade::InteractionLoop::action(): assumption ‘!swap’ failure
  From: Xue, 2021-12-22
• Re: [Question #699932]: Modéliser un fluide hydraulique
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-12-20
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #699932]: Modéliser un fluide hydraulique
  From: HANS MPOYO BWISHITA, 2021-12-21
• Re: [Question #699932]: Modéliser un fluide hydraulique
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-12-21
• Re: [Question #699932]: Modéliser un fluide hydraulique
  From: HANS MPOYO BWISHITA, 2021-12-21
• Re: [Question #699932]: Modéliser un fluide hydraulique
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-12-21
• Re: [Question #699932]: Modéliser un fluide hydraulique
  From: HANS MPOYO BWISHITA, 2021-12-27
• Re: [Question #699932]: Modéliser un fluide hydraulique
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-12-27
• Re: [Question #699932]: Modéliser un fluide hydraulique
  From: Launchpad Janitor, 2022-01-12
• Re: [Question #699937]: Change 3D inertia to 2D/1D inertia
  From: Mithushan Soundaranathan, 2021-12-20
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #699937]: Change 3D inertia to 2D/1D inertia
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-12-20
• Re: [Question #699937]: Change 3D inertia to 2D/1D inertia
  From: Mithushan Soundaranathan, 2021-12-22
• Re: [Question #699937]: Change 3D inertia to 2D/1D inertia
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-12-22
• Re: [Question #699937]: Change 3D inertia to 2D/1D inertia
  From: Mithushan Soundaranathan, 2021-12-22
• [Question #699937]: Change 3D inertia to 2D/1D inertia
  From: Mithushan Soundaranathan, 2021-12-20
• [Question #699932]: Modéliser un fluide hydraulique
  From: HANS MPOYO BWISHITA, 2021-12-20
• Re: [Question #699917]: "noFlowscenario.py" example not working
  From: Robert Caulk, 2021-12-18
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #699917]: "noFlowscenario.py" example not working
  From: Zoheir Khademian, 2021-12-18
• Re: [Question #699917]: "noFlowscenario.py" example not working
  From: Robert Caulk, 2021-12-21
• Re: [Question #699917]: "noFlowscenario.py" example not working
  From: Zoheir Khademian, 2021-12-25
• Re: [Question #699917]: "noFlowscenario.py" example not working
  From: Robert Caulk, 2021-12-26
• [Question #699917]: "noFlowscenario.py" example not working
  From: Zoheir Khademian, 2021-12-18
• Re: [Question #699908]: Project the hydraulic coupler
  From: Robert Caulk, 2021-12-18
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #699908]: Project the hydraulic coupler
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-12-20
• [Question #699908]: Project the hydraulic coupler
  From: HANS MPOYO BWISHITA, 2021-12-17
• Re: [Question #699902]: Project the hydraulic coupler
  From: Robert Caulk, 2021-12-17
• [Question #699902]: Project the hydraulic coupler
  From: HANS MPOYO BWISHITA, 2021-12-17
• [Question #699889]: (French) projet d'un coupleur hydraulique
  From: HANS MPOYO BWISHITA, 2021-12-16
• Re: [Question #699838]: SWRC curve for fine-grained soil
  From: Bruno Chareyre, 2021-12-14
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #699838]: SWRC curve for fine-grained soil
  From: Hossein, 2021-12-15
• Re: [Question #699857]: lateral strain in uniaxial test with aabbDim()
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-12-14
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #699857]: lateral strain in uniaxial test with aabbDim()
  From: Ziyu Wang, 2021-12-16
• [Question #699857]: lateral strain in uniaxial test with aabbDim()
  From: Ziyu Wang, 2021-12-14
• [Question #699838]: SWRC curve for fine-grained soil
  From: Hossein, 2021-12-12
• Re: [Question #699820]: Questions about engine settings
  From: Xue, 2021-12-12
• [Question #699820]: Questions about engine settings
  From: Xue, 2021-12-10
• Re: [Question #699807]: Particle Size distribution for fine-grained soil
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-12-10
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #699807]: Particle Size distribution for fine-grained soil
  From: Hossein, 2021-12-10
• Re: [Question #699807]: Particle Size distribution for fine-grained soil
  From: Karol Brzezinski, 2021-12-10
• Re: [Question #699807]: Particle Size distribution for fine-grained soil
  From: Hossein, 2021-12-11
• Re: [Question #699807]: Particle Size distribution for fine-grained soil
  From: Karol Brzezinski, 2021-12-11
• Re: [Question #699807]: Particle Size distribution for fine-grained soil
  From: Hossein, 2021-12-11
• Re: [Question #699807]: Particle Size distribution for fine-grained soil
  From: Karol Brzezinski, 2021-12-11
• Re: [Question #699807]: Particle Size distribution for fine-grained soil
  From: Hossein, 2021-12-11
• [Question #699807]: Particle Size distribution for fine-grained soil
  From: Hossein, 2021-12-09
• New bibliograpĥic reference for Yade (please update your database)
  From: Bruno Chareyre, 2021-12-09
• Re: [Question #699603]: getSaturation - 2PFV drainage
  From: Launchpad Janitor, 2021-12-09
• Re: [Question #699796]: Delete interaction
  From: Karol Brzezinski, 2021-12-09
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #699796]: Delete interaction
  From: Przemek, 2021-12-09
• Re: [Question #699796]: Delete interaction
  From: Karol Brzezinski, 2021-12-09
• Re: [Question #699796]: Delete interaction
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-12-09
• Re: [Question #699796]: Delete interaction
  From: Przemek, 2021-12-09
• Re: [Question #699796]: Delete interaction
  From: Przemek, 2021-12-10
• Re: [Question #699796]: Delete interaction
  From: Przemek, 2021-12-10
• [Question #699796]: Delete interaction
  From: Przemek, 2021-12-09
• Re: [Question #692568]: Changing joint frictional properties for specific bodies later
  From: Wang Benxin, 2021-12-08
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #692568]: Changing joint frictional properties for specific bodies later
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-12-09
• Re: [Question #699779]: Using Hertz - Mindlin Contact Law
  From: Karol Brzezinski, 2021-12-08
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #699779]: Using Hertz - Mindlin Contact Law
  From: Hossein, 2021-12-08
• Re: [Question #699779]: Using Hertz - Mindlin Contact Law
  From: Karol Brzezinski, 2021-12-08
• Re: [Question #699779]: Using Hertz - Mindlin Contact Law
  From: Hossein, 2021-12-09
• [Question #699779]: Using Hertz - Mindlin Contact Law
  From: Hossein, 2021-12-07
• Re: [Question #699741]: How to fix boundary walls
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-12-04
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #699741]: How to fix boundary walls
  From: Leonard, 2021-12-05
• Re: [Question #699741]: How to fix boundary walls
  From: Leonard, 2021-12-05
• [Question #699741]: How to fix boundary walls
  From: Leonard, 2021-12-03
• Re: [Question #699714]: Python problems in Yade 2021.01a
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-12-02
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #699714]: Python problems in Yade 2021.01a
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-12-02
• Re: [Question #699714]: Python problems in Yade 2021.01a
  From: mohsen, 2021-12-05
• Re: [Question #699714]: Python problems in Yade 2021.01a
  From: Anton Gladky, 2021-12-05
• Re: [Question #699714]: Python problems in Yade 2021.01a
  From: Anton Gladky, 2021-12-05
• Re: [Question #699714]: Python problems in Yade 2021.01a
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-12-06
• Re: [Question #699714]: Python problems in Yade 2021.01a
  From: mohsen, 2021-12-15
• Re: [Question #699714]: Python problems in Yade 2021.01a
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-12-15
• Re: [Question #699714]: Python problems in Yade 2021.01a
  From: mohsen, 2021-12-20
• Re: [Question #699714]: Python problems in Yade 2021.01a
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-12-20
• Re: [Question #699714]: Python problems in Yade 2021.01a
  From: Jan Stránský, 2021-12-20
• [Question #699714]: Python problems in Yade 2021.01a
  From: mohsen, 2021-12-02
• Re: [Question #699705]: Empirical value of rolling stiffness (Krot)
  From: Karol Brzezinski, 2021-12-01
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [Question #699705]: Empirical value of rolling stiffness (Krot)
  From: Zhicheng Gao, 2021-12-02
• Re: [Question #699705]: Empirical value of rolling stiffness (Krot)
  From: Karol Brzezinski, 2021-12-02
• Re: [Question #699705]: Empirical value of rolling stiffness (Krot)
  From: Zhicheng Gao, 2021-12-02
• Re: [Question #699705]: Empirical value of rolling stiffness (Krot)
  From: Zhicheng Gao, 2021-12-02
• Re: [Question #699705]: Empirical value of rolling stiffness (Krot)
  From: Karol Brzezinski, 2021-12-02
• Re: [Question #699705]: Empirical value of rolling stiffness (Krot)
  From: Jérôme Duriez, 2021-12-02

 •  Take the tour  •  Read the guide  •  Help for mailing lists  

© 2004-2021 Canonical Ltd.  •  Terms of use  •  Data privacy  •  Contact Launchpad Support  •  Blog  •  Careers  •  System status