yade-users team mailing list archive
Mailing list archive
Re: Cell mass
since as you say it is a mass density, that would not work. I
mean, I have tried different cell dimensions (I guess that is what
you mean with size of the period) and have employed different size
distributions. In all the cases, the same problem was shown.
I meant, find a value suitable for you, and then change cell dimensions,
everything else equal. Do instabilities appear in this case?
It has a physical meaning and a clear role : it defines an inertia
linking time derivative of strain rate (strain acceleration) and a
stress. I recognize however there is a dimensional mismatch at the
moment, the reason is unclear to me (there should be a squared length
It is integrated in an explicit scheme and coupled with elastic response
of the sample, so there is no surprise if it is unstable in some cases,
independently of dimensional consistency.
This mass value influences very much the stability, and one has
only to guess about it (I mean, it is a random number, depending
also on the micromechanical parameters chosen). Besides this, it
does not have a proper physical meaning for the purpose of the
simulation. That is why I do not understand its role.
I have no idea. Another way is non-dynamic control of stress in the
period. If it is dynamic, it needs an inertia. Let you suggest better
definition of inertia if you have some, numerical experiments could give
indications (I never got instabilities in dynamic cells, so I don't
really know what triggers them).
I think we could write the algorithm in a simpler way, if you have
any ideas how to do it differently do let me know.