yade-users team mailing list archive
-
yade-users team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #06073
Re: [Question #199540]: Who is usung these contact laws?
Question #199540 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/199540
Status: Open => Answered
Chiara Modenese proposed the following answer:
On 6 Jun 2012, at 11:41, Chareyre wrote:
> Question #199540 on Yade changed:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/199540
>
> Status: Answered => Open
>
> Chareyre is still having a problem:
>> This "irreversible" behaviour happens in all the Yade Laws where the
> rolling is implemented so it is not specific to
> Law2_SCG_MomentPhys_CohesionlessMomentRotation.
>
> I was not sure of that.
OK.
>
>> The details of the implementation, however, are different (use of
> quaternions versus incremental implementation). Do you think that this
> could be a good reason for keeping it?
>
> Maybe not, if the difference is only in implementation.
I believe that is the only difference but I have not tested much because
I started to use the incremental formulation (which I did test but
versus other implementations like Plassiard's formulation - still
incremental). Maybe we could keep it for future reference in case that
kind of use of quaternions became useful.
> Boon is not
> using SMR?
I think he has used it a long time ago for some background analyses but nothing more than that (not sure if he still reads the mailing list so I will have to ask him about it and then let you know).
Chiara
>
> Bruno
>
> --
> You received this question notification because you are a member of
> yade-users, which is an answer contact for Yade.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-users
> Post to : yade-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-users
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
--
You received this question notification because you are a member of
yade-users, which is an answer contact for Yade.