yade-users team mailing list archive

[Jan Stránský <question252656@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Question #252656 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/252656

Jan Stránský proposed the following answer:
0.5*PWaveTimeStep() should be safe enough.. Do you have also something else
in your simulation (e.g. some facets or walls), or only spheres?
Jan


2014-08-05 15:51 GMT+02:00 Colin Power <question252656@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>:

> Question #252656 on Yade changed:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/252656
>
> Colin Power posted a new comment:
> I can try running my simulation with a smaller time step and see what
> happens.
>
> The successful simulation was ran with time step 5.67819191123e-05,
> while the failed one used 2.6296979111e-06. The sphere radii in the
> first simulation are very closely distributed around 0.18. The failed
> simulation uses radius of 0.05 and a fuzz of 0.6666. I used
> 0.5*PWaveTimeStep() to achieve these time steps.
>
> --
> You received this question notification because you are a member of
> yade-users, which is an answer contact for Yade.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-users
> Post to     : yade-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-users
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>

-- 
You received this question notification because you are a member of
yade-users, which is an answer contact for Yade.