yade-users team mailing list archive

[Jan Stránský <question292846@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Question #292846 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/292846

    Status: Open => Answered

Jan Stránský proposed the following answer:
Hi Varun,
yes, you are right. The s[1]-particle_radius in old and s[1] in new version
should do the same.
cheers
Jan


2016-05-04 23:07 GMT+02:00 VG <question292846@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

> Question #292846 on Yade changed:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/292846
>
> VG posted a new comment:
> Also, I got the latest update of yadedaily which has the change you
> mentioned above. The point you mentioned above:
>
> "in pack.inSphere, it was a real bug. Of course, you can play with settings
>  like using s[1] or s[1]-particle_radius, but this is different point."
>
> With the new version of yadedaily, it generates the exact same number of
> particles in an aggregate, as generated when I used
> "s[1]-particle_radius"  instead of "s[1]" with the previous version of
> yadedaily.
>
> In my opinion, your fix in the code and the use of
> "s[1]-particle_radius" while generating randomDensepack  are doing the
> exact same things.
>
>
> For example, in the above script, using a sample_diameter of 2e-4 and
> particle diameter of 1e-5, results in 3732 particles within an agglomerate
> results in a packing ratio of 0.466, whereas the previous version lead to
> 4372 particles and a packing ratio of 0.55.
>
> --
> You received this question notification because your team yade-users is
> an answer contact for Yade.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-users
> Post to     : yade-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-users
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>

-- 
You received this question notification because your team yade-users is
an answer contact for Yade.