yahoo-eng-team team mailing list archive

Thread
Date

[Bug 1188246] Re: Port 0 is accepted as a valid port-range value for security group rule creation

To: yahoo-eng-team@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Aaron Rosen <arosen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 20:15:15 -0000
Reply-to: Bug 1188246 <1188246@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Though this port is not officially used (and marked as reserved) one
could craft packets and use 0 thus it's valid.

** Changed in: quantum
       Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to quantum.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1188246

Title:
  Port 0 is accepted as a valid port-range value for security group rule
  creation

Status in OpenStack Quantum (virtual network service):
  Invalid

Bug description:
  Port range is accepting port 0 as a valid port number.  Security group
  rule will be created for port 0.

  
  quantum security-group-rule-create --direction ingress --protocol tcp --port-range-min 0 --port-range-max 111 --remote-ip-prefix 0.0.0.0/0 bad
  Created a new security_group_rule:
  -------------------------------------------------------+
  Field 	Value

  -------------------------------------------------------+
  direction 	ingress
  ethertype 	IPv4
  external_id 	 
  id 	8437e51f-b1eb-4824-a56e-40e7c972878e
  port_range_max 	111
  port_range_min 	0
  protocol 	tcp
  security_group_id 	c38d90ec-519b-472e-8afc-b5711b83f6e0
  source_group_id 	 
  source_ip_prefix 	 
  tenant_id 	28312660553314

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/quantum/+bug/1188246/+subscriptions