yahoo-eng-team team mailing list archive
-
yahoo-eng-team team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #07905
[Bug 1265734] [NEW] OVF or bare?
Public bug reported:
Hi,
I have a question regarding choosing container for an image. For example
for the testVM image provided in openstack dashboard the container is
bare by defalut(bare container format means the image does not have a
container or metadata), however when I use hortonworks hdp plugin image
for centOS which container format should I use ?I doubt if I should use
bare as this image has pre populated data like hadoop-libhdfs, hadoop-
native, hadoop-sbin and more.
The problem is my cluster remains in waiting state even though all the
instances are active. So I wanted to make sure if using bare for the pre
populated hdp QCOW2 image is fine or if it makes it useless.
Thank you.
** Affects: nova
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to OpenStack Compute (nova).
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1265734
Title:
OVF or bare?
Status in OpenStack Compute (Nova):
New
Bug description:
Hi,
I have a question regarding choosing container for an image. For
example for the testVM image provided in openstack dashboard the
container is bare by defalut(bare container format means the image
does not have a container or metadata), however when I use hortonworks
hdp plugin image for centOS which container format should I use ?I
doubt if I should use bare as this image has pre populated data like
hadoop-libhdfs, hadoop-native, hadoop-sbin and more.
The problem is my cluster remains in waiting state even though all the
instances are active. So I wanted to make sure if using bare for the
pre populated hdp QCOW2 image is fine or if it makes it useless.
Thank you.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1265734/+subscriptions
Follow ups
References