← Back to team overview

yahoo-eng-team team mailing list archive

[Bug 1347361] [NEW] There should be a naming convention for neutron DB tables

 

Public bug reported:

Now that the database is healed and all tables are present, the names of
tables are haphazard and there is no convention for avoiding naming
conflicts or having sensible grouping.

A naming convention may look something like:

<vendor>_<plugin|service>_<feature|purpose>

Existing tables should be renamed to follow the convention.

A README file explaining the convention should be created in the
directory with the models.

** Affects: neutron
     Importance: Undecided
     Assignee: Henry Gessau (gessau)
         Status: New

** Changed in: neutron
     Assignee: (unassigned) => Henry Gessau (gessau)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1347361

Title:
  There should be a naming convention for neutron DB tables

Status in OpenStack Neutron (virtual network service):
  New

Bug description:
  Now that the database is healed and all tables are present, the names
  of tables are haphazard and there is no convention for avoiding naming
  conflicts or having sensible grouping.

  A naming convention may look something like:

  <vendor>_<plugin|service>_<feature|purpose>

  Existing tables should be renamed to follow the convention.

  A README file explaining the convention should be created in the
  directory with the models.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1347361/+subscriptions


Follow ups

References