yahoo-eng-team team mailing list archive
-
yahoo-eng-team team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #47670
[Bug 1554791] [NEW] Horizon should use upper-constraints in testing
Public bug reported:
Recently OpenStack introduced a mechanism to specify a constrained
"working set" of packages that are "guaranteed" to produce a working
OpenStack environment. This pinning of packages limits the more broadly-
defined requirements.txt which is managed by global-requirements. Even
though it pins package versions, it is called "upper-constraints".
We should include those constraints in our test runs.
A mechanism exists to allow constraints to be overridden for specific
patches by using Depends-On to a constraints update, allowing testing of
new constraints.
Given enough test coverage in the constraints updates (to be addressed
in a separate patch to the gate jobs for that project) this would have
allowed Horizon to detect that the recent heatclient update broke
Horizon, but also would have allowed the Horizon gate to continue
unaffected by the new heatclient update (because we would have been
pinned to a previous, working version).
** Affects: horizon
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to OpenStack Dashboard (Horizon).
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1554791
Title:
Horizon should use upper-constraints in testing
Status in OpenStack Dashboard (Horizon):
New
Bug description:
Recently OpenStack introduced a mechanism to specify a constrained
"working set" of packages that are "guaranteed" to produce a working
OpenStack environment. This pinning of packages limits the more
broadly-defined requirements.txt which is managed by global-
requirements. Even though it pins package versions, it is called
"upper-constraints".
We should include those constraints in our test runs.
A mechanism exists to allow constraints to be overridden for specific
patches by using Depends-On to a constraints update, allowing testing
of new constraints.
Given enough test coverage in the constraints updates (to be addressed
in a separate patch to the gate jobs for that project) this would have
allowed Horizon to detect that the recent heatclient update broke
Horizon, but also would have allowed the Horizon gate to continue
unaffected by the new heatclient update (because we would have been
pinned to a previous, working version).
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1554791/+subscriptions
Follow ups