yahoo-eng-team team mailing list archive
-
yahoo-eng-team team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #55939
[Bug 1518392] Re: [RFE] setup arp_responder on integration bridge (without enabling l2_pop)
[Expired for neutron because there has been no activity for 60 days.]
** Changed in: neutron
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1518392
Title:
[RFE] setup arp_responder on integration bridge (without enabling
l2_pop)
Status in neutron:
Expired
Bug description:
Remove the dependency between arp_responder and l2_pop.
arp_responder should be enabled without enabling l2_pop.
setup arp_responder on integration bridge
Implement arp_responder on integration bridge rather than
on tunneling bridge and without l2pop. Use port_update and port_delete notifications to update arp entries for ports, instead of l2_pop.
The advantages of this approach are -
1) arp_responder can be enabled without l2pop driver
2) support arp_responder for all network types(vlans, vxlan, etc)
arp_responder based on l2pop is supported for only overlay networks.
3) support arp for distributed ports(DVR and HA).
This is not supported in l2pop based arp_responder.
4) arp packets for local ports(ports connected to same br-int) will be resolved in br-int without broadcasting to actual ports connected to br-int.
Already submitted https://review.openstack.org/#/c/248177/ for this.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1518392/+subscriptions
References