yahoo-eng-team team mailing list archive

[Matt Riedemann <mriedem.os@xxxxxxxxx>]

Since there is no top-level consumers resource in the placement API I'm
not sure how much internal machinery we want to document in the
reference. This came from a comment I had in a nova change that
mentioned it - and I'm mostly concerned about nova making assumptions
about how the internally undocumented behavior of placement works today
but might not work in the future.

https://review.openstack.org/#/c/591597/5/nova/scheduler/client/report.py@2110

** Changed in: nova
   Importance: Undecided => Low

** Changed in: nova
       Status: New => Opinion

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to OpenStack Compute (nova).
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1794138

Title:
  placement api ref should state that PUT empty allocation will delete
  the consumer

Status in OpenStack Compute (nova):
  Opinion

Bug description:
  When empty allocations dict is sent in the body of PUT
  /allocations/{consumer_uuid} the placement deletes the consumer. This
  should be stated in the API ref.

  https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/placement/#update-allocations

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1794138/+subscriptions