yahoo-eng-team team mailing list archive
-
yahoo-eng-team team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #93843
[Bug 2061346] [NEW] Does nova really need to limit number of pcie port to 28?
Public bug reported:
Dear all, sorry for this confusion:
By my test, an instance attaches interface/disk over than the max config
num_pcie_ports in arm, from [1], I know that the max of that config
num_pcie_ports=28 is limited by QEMU, however, the number of PCIs
attached on my instance has far exceeded this limit.
Does nova limitation num_pcie_ports=28 need to update to a larger
number? Could anyone give me some advice?
[1] https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/c199becf52267ba37c5191f6f82e29bb5232b607/nova/conf/libvirt.py#L809
My Openstack Version: W
Libvirt Version: 8.0.0
Qemu Version: 6.2.0
** Affects: nova
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to OpenStack Compute (nova).
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061346
Title:
Does nova really need to limit number of pcie port to 28?
Status in OpenStack Compute (nova):
New
Bug description:
Dear all, sorry for this confusion:
By my test, an instance attaches interface/disk over than the max
config num_pcie_ports in arm, from [1], I know that the max of that
config num_pcie_ports=28 is limited by QEMU, however, the number of
PCIs attached on my instance has far exceeded this limit.
Does nova limitation num_pcie_ports=28 need to update to a larger
number? Could anyone give me some advice?
[1] https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/c199becf52267ba37c5191f6f82e29bb5232b607/nova/conf/libvirt.py#L809
My Openstack Version: W
Libvirt Version: 8.0.0
Qemu Version: 6.2.0
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2061346/+subscriptions
Follow ups