yellow team mailing list archive
-
yellow team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00983
Re: New Tarmac instance
-
To:
yellow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
From:
Gary Poster <gary.poster@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-
Date:
Tue, 03 Jul 2012 14:12:59 -0400
-
In-reply-to:
<CADyEPwt7ofaCmWPmC44eE7ATG7eEMHat8mKbCSZZ1eBu_-=WHQ@mail.gmail.com>
-
User-agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120615 Thunderbird/13.0.1
On 07/03/2012 12:41 PM, Graham Binns wrote:
> ... is up and running at 10.55.60.123. You should all be able to run
>
> % ssh tarmac@10.55.60.123
>
> The tarmac log is in /home/tarmac/.config/tarmac/tarmac.log
>
> Once the canonistack dance was done, it was really straightforward to
> set up, so we should all take a crack at it at some point.
Awesome, thank you.
>
> What was the reason for not running our buildbot charms on
> Canonistack? Is it that the Juju/OpenStack story is particularly
> unreliable?
- juju and canonistack do (did?) not play well with one another because
the advertised machine names could not be resolved anywhere (including
in chinstrap). I tried to approach this from the openstack/IS side with
no luck. Others (Diogo, for one) have hacked juju dependencies instead.
Anyway, not a clean story.
- the big canonistack machines are not big enough for us.
Gary
References