zeitgeist team mailing list archive
-
zeitgeist team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00439
[Bug 489262] [NEW] Interpretation conventions
Public bug reported:
I think using
visit/modified is non-sense
I would push for replacing it with open/close/saved
THIS IS CRITICAL FOR THE DATAPROVIDERS AS WELL AS CLIENT APPS
** Affects: zeitgeist
Importance: Critical
Status: Triaged
** Changed in: zeitgeist
Importance: Undecided => Critical
** Changed in: zeitgeist
Milestone: None => 0.3.1
** Changed in: zeitgeist
Milestone: 0.3.1 => 0.3.0
** Changed in: zeitgeist
Status: New => Triaged
** Description changed:
- I think using
+ I think using
visit/modified is non-sense
I would push for replacing it with open/close/saved
+ THIS IS CRITICAL FOR THE DATAPROVIDERS AS WELL AS CLIENT APPS
--
Interpretation conventions
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/489262
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Zeitgeist-Engine, which is the registrant for Zeitgeist Framework.
Status in Zeitgeist Framework: Triaged
Bug description:
I think using
visit/modified is non-sense
I would push for replacing it with open/close/saved
THIS IS CRITICAL FOR THE DATAPROVIDERS AS WELL AS CLIENT APPS
Follow ups
-
[Bug 489262] Re: Event Interpretations Ontology
From: Siegfried Gevatter, 2010-08-06
-
[Bug 489262] Re: Event Interpretations Ontology
From: Markus Korn, 2010-05-13
-
[Bug 489262] Re: Event Interpretations Ontology
From: Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen, 2010-04-18
-
[Bug 489262] Re: Event Interpretations Ontology
From: Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen, 2010-01-07
-
[Bug 489262] Re: Event Interpretations Ontology
From: Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen, 2009-12-06
-
[Bug 489262] Re: Interpretation conventions
From: Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen, 2009-12-03
-
[Bug 489262] Re: Interpretation conventions
From: Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen, 2009-12-03
-
[Bug 489262] Re: Interpretation conventions
From: Seif Lotfy, 2009-11-29
-
[Bug 489262] Re: Interpretation conventions
From: Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen, 2009-11-28
-
[Bug 489262] Re: Interpretation conventions
From: Seif Lotfy, 2009-11-27
-
[Bug 489262] [NEW] Interpretation conventions
From: Seif Lotfy, 2009-11-27
References