zim-wiki team mailing list archive

[smu@xxxxxxx]

Hi,

I can use \underline without ulem, but I found now, that ulem ist used
for struck out text (\sout{...}).

regards,
 stefan

On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 09:06:01PM +0200, Johannes Reinhardt wrote:
> The ulem package is used to typeset text in underline style underlined.
> I missed the fact that the emph style is wrong. I fixed the templates
> in this branch:
> 
> lp:~johannes-reinhardt/zim/fixes
> 
> @Jaap: It noticed that the options structure mechanism does not work for
> the LaTeX templates. The options dict that is passed to the dumper is
> always empty. I fail to completely understand the code you wrote for
> that, perhaps you can take a look.
> 
> Thanks for the report
> 
> Johannes
> 
> 
> On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 11:20:16 +0200
> smu@xxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > I am wondering, why the \usepackage{ulem} is defined in the latex
> > template. With this package, emphasised text (\emph{....} in the tex
> > file) is underlined instead of italic.
> > I would prefere the same format in the pdf and in zim (where it is
> > possible), so in this case I would prefere italic. The HTML export uses
> > italic letters for emphasised text.
> > 
> > Or is there another reason for using ulem?
> > 
> > best regards,
> >  Stefan
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~zim-wiki
> > Post to     : zim-wiki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~zim-wiki
> > More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> 
> 
> -- 
> Johannes Reinhardt <jreinhardt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~zim-wiki
> Post to     : zim-wiki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~zim-wiki
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>