zim-wiki team mailing list archive
-
zim-wiki team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #03299
Re: Zim history usage
-
To:
Ringo P <ringo@erratica.solutions>, Jaap Karssenberg <jaap.karssenberg@xxxxxxxxx>, Zim <zim-wiki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-
From:
Güven, Ugur Murat <murat.gueven@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-
Date:
Fri, 20 Feb 2015 11:15:59 +0100
-
Accept-language:
de-DE, en-US
-
Acceptlanguage:
de-DE, en-US
-
In-reply-to:
<54E6FF87.1000902@erratica.solutions>
-
Thread-index:
AdBM8GP+JH+tGKJGSZCJaB7lgtpliQABawoA
-
Thread-topic:
[Zim-wiki] Zim history usage
Hi Jaap,
keep it simple, so "recent pages" is good for me.
Thank you and Regards,
Murat
On 20/02/15 08:45, Jaap Karssenberg wrote:
Hi all,
Hereby another request for comments about zim usage. Does anyone here use the history in zim as strict sequence?
What I mean is this: for example, if you navigate from page "A" to page "B" then again to page "A" and again to "B" (without using the 'back' button), your history will look like "A -> B -> A -> B" and clicking 'back' repeatedly will switch back and forth between these pages.
In comparison, the "recent pages" view in the pathbar would only show "B, A" and forget about the redundant occurrences of both pages in the sequence.
Now if as a user you just want to find back pages you recently accessed the later is enough. But if you need a strict sequence that you can play back, the first is what you need.
So my question is: can we remove the strict history and only support "recent page" - or is there a good use case that uses the history as a sequence? What do you use the history for ?
(As you may have guessed, just supporting the "recent pages" without the strict sequence allows me to remove some code and additional accounting)
Regards,
Jaap
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~zim-wiki
Post to : zim-wiki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:zim-wiki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~zim-wiki
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
--
RINGO
Follow ups
References