ac100 team mailing list archive
Mailing list archive
Re: Kernel update request
the bug seems to have been introduced in 4.6.2, at least the
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 4:29 AM, Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 12/16/2011 02:49 PM, Jani Monoses wrote:
>> your observation of toolchain changing was spot on.
>> I built the latest 3.0 for armel and armhf (so those with precise
>> armhf can test too) using gcc 4.5
>> Others please test :)
>> And it boots fine.
>> Rebuilt same tree with 4.6 and locks up with Toshiba logo.
>> I am not sure if it is an unrelated toolchain issue, or only triggered
>> along with the RAM timing change, but I suspect
>> it is toolchain only. I rebuilt a 2.6.38 too with the 4.6 toolchain
>> and it did not boot.
> FYI, all the kernels I build are with a home-grown gcc-4.6.1 (built
> using crosstool-ng, and a virgin 4.6.1 release without patches), so
> there's nothing intrinsically wrong with gcc-4.6 itself.
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ac100
> Post to : ac100@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ac100
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp