banking-addons-drivers team mailing list archive

[Alexis de Lattre <alexis@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Le 23/01/2014 11:34, Alexis de Lattre a écrit :
> If you try to install modules from both branches, you will get 
> conflicting views :
> - In account_banking/account_banking_view.xml line 181, the field 
> "period_id" is removed from the tree view of account.bank.statement.
> - In 
> bank-statement-reconcile-70/account_statement_ext/statement_view.xml 
> line 87, the field "period_id" is also removed from the tree view of 
> account.bank.statement.
>
> There may be other conflicts, I don't know. Maybe it's just this one 
> and it can be solved very easily.

Stéphane Bidoul and I have worked together at FOSDEM to be able to use 
SEPA direct debit and the bank-statement-reconcile modules. In fact, 
this meant being able to use SEPA direct debit without the module 
account_banking. So it is a matter of moving code from one module to 
another and modify dependancies. The merge proposal is here and it is 
waiting for reviews :

https://code.launchpad.net/~banking-addons-drivers/banking-addons/direct-debit-refactoring-fosdem2/+merge/206619

By the way, this MP also fixes a stupid bug fix that made the SEPA code 
unusable in the current official banking-addons branch.

--
Alexis de Lattre