checkbox-dev team mailing list archive

[Zygmunt Krynicki <zygmunt.krynicki@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I'm fine with something more reusable but I need concrete ideas.

The only issue I can think of is the non-locality of such a declaration.

Thanks
ZK


On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 9:45 AM, Ara Pulido <ara.pulido@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:

>
>
> On 23/03/14 23:02, Zygmunt Krynicki wrote:
> > Hey
> >
> > I've filed a bug [1] on being unable to use a resource job from another
> > provider namespace, and started the discussion on possible ways to
> > address it. I would welcome your feedback on my proposal.
>
> I like it, but if you need to use the package resource (i.e.) in many
> jobs in the same job file, would it make sense to think of ways to
> import once, use many times?
>
> (If this would make things a lot more difficult, I am happy with your
> approach. I prefer to do simple things).
>
> Thanks,
> Ara.
>
> >
> > Thanks
> > ZK
> >
> > [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/checkbox/+bug/1296424
> >
> >
>
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~checkbox-dev
> Post to     : checkbox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~checkbox-dev
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>