← Back to team overview

coapp-developers team mailing list archive

Re: Engine - Teds initial take

 

That's a pretty poor reason to not type a few extra characters... but I
can't offer a concrete reason why we should support ANSI.

/rafael

On 8/4/2010 11:25 AM, Elizabeth M Smith wrote:
> On 8/4/2010 11:13 AM, Rivera, Rafael wrote:
>> Looks nice, love the chip name.
>>
>> Just one note -- I see wide-character strings in use. I suggest
>> replacing them, and their print functions, with T equivalents, leaving
>> the choice of ANSI or UNICODE to the magical defines in the headers and
>> ultimately the human compiling this stuff.
>>
>> So, from initial glance, I'd replace L"" with _T("") and fwprintf with
>> _ftprintf.
>>    
>
> No way in hell do I want to support anyone doing that - then you'd
> have idiots compiling and giving out version that don't support
> UNICODE strings and users complaining about it
>
> ICK
>
> UNICODE or nothing.
>
> Thanks,
> Elizabeth M Smith




Follow ups

References