dhis2-documenters team mailing list archive

[Lars Helge Øverland <larshelge@xxxxxxxxx>]

No problem. Thanks for the effort with the translations.


On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Inés Bebea <ines.bebea@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Thanks, Lars. I got it! :)
>
> 2012/9/20 Lars Helge Øverland <larshelge@xxxxxxxxx>
>
>> Hi Inéz,
>>
>> I think it is correct. The idea is that immunization coverage
>> indicators are using routine reported data as numerator and population
>> data as the denominator. So if the data completeness (ie. reporting
>> rates) are very different you can't really compare counties - e.g. a
>> low value might imply low reporting rather than low immunization
>> numbers.
>>
>> Lars
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Inés Bebea <ines.bebea@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I am working on translation of the User Implementation Guide. As I got
>> to
>> > section 2.4, I get that I am not sure if the following explanation
>> provided
>> > is correct:
>> >
>> > "Looking at the final column (Immuniz. Compl. %) which indicates the
>> > completeness of reporting of the immunisation form for the same period,
>> we
>> > can see that the numbers are more or less the same in the two counties
>> we
>> > compared, which tells us that the coverage rates are comparable across
>> the
>> > two counties."
>> >
>> > I would think that "the completeness rates are comparable across the two
>> > counties" but not that "the coverage rates are..".
>> >
>> > Any suggestions? May I translate it as it is?
>> >
>> > Thanks!
>> >
>> > Inés
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-documenters
>> > Post to     : dhis2-documenters@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-documenters
>> > More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Inés Bebea
> @bbaobabb
>
>
>