divmod-dev team mailing list archive
-
divmod-dev team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00364
Re: PyFlakes maintenance
On 1 January 2013 21:04, <exarkun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 06:19 pm, florent.xicluna@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>
>>
>> Now, I expect some positive criticism about this approach, and any
>> side-effect we need to take into account.
>
>
> Splitting pyflakes into its own repository sounds fine to me. As long as it
> is done properly, I'm entirely in favor of this. (Figuring out exactly what
> "properly" means may involve a bit of work, fortunately for Pyflakes it
> seems like you're willing to undertake that work :)
>
+1
I'd say that a bare minimum would be an email to this list with the
subject "[RFC] Split pyflakes into its own repository".
jml
References
-
PyFlakes maintenance
From: Florent, 2012-12-29
-
Re: PyFlakes maintenance
From: Glyph, 2012-12-29
-
Re: PyFlakes maintenance
From: Florent, 2012-12-29
-
Re: PyFlakes maintenance
From: Glyph, 2012-12-30
-
Re: PyFlakes maintenance
From: Florent, 2012-12-31
-
Re: PyFlakes maintenance
From: Glyph, 2012-12-31
-
Re: PyFlakes maintenance
From: Florent, 2012-12-31
-
Re: PyFlakes maintenance
From: Glyph, 2012-12-31
-
Re: PyFlakes maintenance
From: Florent, 2013-01-01
-
Re: PyFlakes maintenance
From: exarkun, 2013-01-01