dolfin team mailing list archive

[jhoffman@xxxxxxxxxxx]

>
> Quoting Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
>> Looks good, but could we change the name? Synchronizer sounds like
>> something responsible for synchronizing other things. My suggestion
>> would be Synchronized, Synchronizable or TimeDependent. (Compare base
>> classes/interfaces in Java: Editable, Adjustable, Comparable,
>> Serializable etc.)
>
> Sure. In think that TimeDependent makes most clear what's going on.
>
>>
>> Another suggestion is to remove bool time_set and make sure real* t is
>> null when not specified (just check if ( !t )).
>
> I tried this to start with, and it initially didn't work because I didn't
> intialise real* t to null (I'm still learning). It works fine now.
>
> If everyone is happy with it, I can change Function to derive from
> TimeDependent
> and remove the time functions.
>
> Garth

Sounds ok with me!

/Johan