dolfin team mailing list archive
-
dolfin team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #02401
Re: Future work
On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 14:30 +0200, Johan Hoffman wrote:
> Apart from the issue of duplicating code with or without templates, what
> do we need to figure out to get the assembly of boundary integrals
> correct?
>
> Do we have a clear way to obtain the FE basis for the boundary of a cell
> given the basis of the cell? Do we use the corresponding basis for for d-1
> dimensions?
>
> /Johan
>
This will have to come from FFC won't it? It might be less efficient,
but we could work with the finite element of the whole cell and perhaps
the edge/face number is enough for FFC to do the rest. I noticed that
the FFC-produced function eval takes "unsigned int boundary" as an
argument, but doesn't do anything with it yet.
Garth
Follow ups
References
-
Future work
From: Anders Logg, 2006-04-03
-
Re: Future work
From: Garth N. Wells, 2006-04-03
-
Re: Future work
From: Anders Logg, 2006-04-04
-
Re: Future work
From: Johan Hoffman, 2006-04-04
-
Re: Future work
From: Anders Logg, 2006-04-04
-
Re: Future work
From: Garth N. Wells, 2006-04-10
-
Re: Future work
From: Anders Logg, 2006-04-10
-
Re: Future work
From: Garth N. Wells, 2006-04-11
-
Re: Future work
From: Anders Logg, 2006-04-11
-
Re: Future work
From: Johan Hoffman, 2006-04-12