dolfin team mailing list archive

[Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx>]

As Johan points out, things tend to sound much more serious than they
are when you communicate by email. Look at the mailing list for any
other project (like Linux) and you will find we are extremely polite,
on the verge of boring. (But let's keep it that way. :-)

/Anders


On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 09:58:55PM +0200, Dag Lindbo wrote:
> Amongst bickering and complaint, I feel compelled to say that I'm very
> impressed with the project - I think Fenics comes out in flying colors
> where other general computational packages let down. It's a great code
> that will benefit academia and industry (and edaucation hopefully). And
> I'm really looking forward to running 0.6.3 this weekend! /Dag
> 
> 
> > On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 04:14:49PM +0200, Garth N. Wells wrote:
> >>
> >> We do our best to work against an official DOLFIN release. Perhaps a
> >> part of the issue is the prominence that has been given to the
> >> dolfin-kth repository gives the impression of a fork.
> >>
> >
> > Since nobody is even remotely interested in a fork, I'm beginning to
> > question email as the primary form of communication. Perhaps we should
> > start holding a monthly DOLFIN video conference?
> >
> >   Johan
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > DOLFIN-dev mailing list
> > DOLFIN-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
> > http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DOLFIN-dev mailing list
> DOLFIN-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev