On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 03:26:14PM -0500, Shawn Walker wrote:
ok, then this higher order mesh data should definitely have it's own
function space. Is it possible to have a FunctionSpace variable (for the
mesh) within the usual FunctionSpace variable for the variational
problem? It's either that or have two separate FunctionSpace variables
floating around and pass them to the bilinear form everytime.
- Shawn
I imagine something like this:
A FunctionSpace V has a variable coordinates (a Function).
That Function in turn has a FunctionSpace W (as all other Functions).
V does not have to be the same as V, but it can (for isoparametric
elements).
--
Anders