dolfin team mailing list archive

[Johannes Ring <johannr@xxxxxxxxx>]

Public bug reported:

Hi,

When running the function unit test on Windows I get a failure:

C:\fenicsslave\src\dolfin\test\unit\function\cpp>test
test.cpp:60:Assertion
Test name: Eval::testArbitraryEval
assertion failed
- Expression: u[0] == sin(3.0*x[0])*sin(3.0*x[1])*sin(3.0*x[2])

Failures !!!
Run: 1   Failure total: 1   Failures: 1   Errors: 0

I have printed both expressions and they seem to be the same but
CPPUNIT_ASSERT still reports a failure. A simple fix is to use
CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL instead of CPPUNIT_ASSERT:


     // Test evaluation of a user-defined function
     f0.eval(&u[0], data);
-    CPPUNIT_ASSERT(u[0] == sin(3.0*x[0])*sin(3.0*x[1])*sin(3.0*x[2]));
+    CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL(u[0], sin(3.0*x[0])*sin(3.0*x[1])*sin(3.0*x[2]));

 #ifdef HAS_GTS
     // Test evaluation of a discrete function

Johannes

** Affects: dolfin
     Importance: Undecided
         Status: New

-- 
Function unit test fails on Windows
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/425729
You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to DOLFIN.

Status in DOLFIN: New

Bug description:
Hi,

When running the function unit test on Windows I get a failure:

C:\fenicsslave\src\dolfin\test\unit\function\cpp>test
test.cpp:60:Assertion
Test name: Eval::testArbitraryEval
assertion failed
- Expression: u[0] == sin(3.0*x[0])*sin(3.0*x[1])*sin(3.0*x[2])

Failures !!!
Run: 1   Failure total: 1   Failures: 1   Errors: 0

I have printed both expressions and they seem to be the same but CPPUNIT_ASSERT still reports a failure. A simple fix is to use CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL instead of CPPUNIT_ASSERT:


     // Test evaluation of a user-defined function
     f0.eval(&u[0], data);
-    CPPUNIT_ASSERT(u[0] == sin(3.0*x[0])*sin(3.0*x[1])*sin(3.0*x[2]));
+    CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL(u[0], sin(3.0*x[0])*sin(3.0*x[1])*sin(3.0*x[2]));

 #ifdef HAS_GTS
     // Test evaluation of a discrete function

Johannes