dolfin team mailing list archive

[Johan Hake <johan.hake@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Wednesday December 1 2010 11:20:13 Anders Logg wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 11:17:36AM -0800, Johan Hake wrote:
> > On Wednesday December 1 2010 08:24:27 Johan Hake wrote:
> > > On Tuesday November 30 2010 22:55:29 Anders Logg wrote:
> > > > Perhaps we should create a simple script dolfin-version that prints
> > > > the current version to make it easy to check?
> > > 
> > > I thought of that too.
> > > 
> > > Maybee we should let CMake produce a script:
> > >   dolfin-version
> > > 
> > > and install it. Using the information in the CMake variable
> > > DOLFIN_VERSION?
> > 
> > Done.
> 
> Great.
> 
> > I also changed the present version, as set in the CMakeLists.txt to
> > 0.9.9+.
> > 
> > This is now reflected in naming of the shared library:
> >   libdolfin.so.0.9.9+
> > 
> > Is it a problem that it does not end with a number?
> 
> I think there was a problem with this at some point. I think I've
> tried it before, but we'll see. If something suddenly fails to link,
> we know why...

If it fails maybe we can create another variable without the '+' for the 
shared library version?

Johan

> > The __version__ string in PyDOLFIN is now also generate automagically :)
> 
> Nice.
> 
> --
> Anders