dolfin team mailing list archive

[Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 11:24:33AM -0800, Johan Hake wrote:
> On Wednesday December 1 2010 11:20:13 Anders Logg wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 11:17:36AM -0800, Johan Hake wrote:
> > > On Wednesday December 1 2010 08:24:27 Johan Hake wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday November 30 2010 22:55:29 Anders Logg wrote:
> > > > > Perhaps we should create a simple script dolfin-version that prints
> > > > > the current version to make it easy to check?
> > > >
> > > > I thought of that too.
> > > >
> > > > Maybee we should let CMake produce a script:
> > > >   dolfin-version
> > > >
> > > > and install it. Using the information in the CMake variable
> > > > DOLFIN_VERSION?
> > >
> > > Done.
> >
> > Great.
> >
> > > I also changed the present version, as set in the CMakeLists.txt to
> > > 0.9.9+.
> > >
> > > This is now reflected in naming of the shared library:
> > >   libdolfin.so.0.9.9+
> > >
> > > Is it a problem that it does not end with a number?
> >
> > I think there was a problem with this at some point. I think I've
> > tried it before, but we'll see. If something suddenly fails to link,
> > we know why...
>
> If it fails maybe we can create another variable without the '+' for the
> shared library version?

Yes, sounds good (unless it relies on some CMAKE mechanism that
requires it to be the same variable).

--
Anders