dolfin team mailing list archive

["Garth N. Wells" <gnw20@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 23/02/11 18:35, Anders Logg wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 10:26:24AM -0800, Johan Hake wrote:
>> On Wednesday February 23 2011 09:08:26 Anders Logg wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 05:03:41PM +0000, Garth N. Wells wrote:
>>>> On 23/02/11 16:59, Anders Logg wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 04:40:09PM +0000, Garth N. Wells wrote:
>>>>>> On 23/02/11 16:35, Anders Logg wrote:
>>>>>>> Is it time to stop pushing so we don't make any last minute breaking
>>>>>>> before the release?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I can stop - the pushes were somewhat related to a bug fix.
>>>>>
>>>>> Great! If you feel the urge to push, you can always push to
>>>>> ~dolfin-core/dolfin/wells. ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Did you just restart the buildbots? I was going to. Anyway, let's wait
>>>>> until they are green and then make the release.
>>>>>
>>>>> I can do the other releases in the meantime. Which packages need
>>>>> release?
>>>>>
>>>>>   FFC     0.9.5
>>>>>   UFC     2.0.0
>>>>>   UFL     0.6.0 (or 1.0?)
>>>>>   Viper   0.6.0 (or 1.0?)
>>>>>   Instant 0.9.9 (or 1.0?)
>>>>>
>>>>> Since we are releasing DOLFIN 1.0 shortly, it might also be good to
>>>>> bump the version numbers of some of the other packages. It would be
>>>>> good to get some comments from the main authors of UFL, Viper, Instant.
>>>>>
>>>>> The main plan could then be to only make new releases of DOLFIN and
>>>>> (maybe) FFC in a month. The other packages have then already be
>>>>> released so we don't need to bother with those (unless we make bug fix
>>>>> releases).
>>>>
>>>> Instant needs a critical fix to allow the calling program to pass the
>>>> SWIG executable, so I wouldn't bump it to 1.0.
>>
>> Agree.
>>
>>>> There are a few other significant issues that may requires changes to
>>>> various packages, so let's not bump any version numbers just yet.
>>>
>>> ok, except for UFC then.
>>>
>>> How about bumping to 0.9.9 (for FFC, FIAT, Viper, UFL)?
>>
>> I suggest bumping just one pointversion. Why should we bump all to 0.9.9?
> 
> To indicate that 1.0 is near.
> 
> FFC will be 0.9.9. Then 1.0 will be released alongside DOLFIN 1.0.
> 

Let's keep the numbering, and bump it a couple of weeks. I suggest that
we focus on bug fixes in coming period, and make new bug fix releases in
a few weeks as a precursor to 1.0.

Garth

> --
> Anders