dolfin team mailing list archive

["Marie E. Rognes" <meg@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 07/07/11 21:21, Anders Logg wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 02:20:44PM +0200, Marie E. Rognes wrote:
> > Is the plan for 1.0-beta to fix
> >
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ffc/+bug/787010
> >
> > and then release?
> Yes + decide on the interface for NonlinearVariationalProblem.
>
> I think that should be all.

Brilliant.

> It would be good to hear more comments on the two suggestions:

I am fairly indifferent.

--
Marie

> 1. (current)
>
>    NonlinearVariationalProblen(lhs, rhs, u, bcs, [J])
>
>    This is consistent with LinearVariationalProblem and the solve()
>    functions; same order of arguments.
>
> 2. (Garth)
>
>    NonlinearVariationalProblen(lhs, u, bcs, [J])
>
>    This removes the unnecessary rhs argument which always has to be
>    zero.
>
> I think there are good arguments for both but not very strong so it's
> a matter of taste.
>
> I'll try to fix bug 787010 now. I'm on vacation so I'm working slower
> than usual.
>
> --
> Anders