drizzle-merge team mailing list archive
-
drizzle-merge team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00203
Re: Current state
I'm guessing the failure is related to the flush that brian added (which
was a great idea, btw) I could fix it with a record, but I'm not sure
that's 100% the right move?
On 12/16/2010 07:53 AM, Lee Bieber wrote:
> I've pushed staging to trunk, however Monty you will need to look at the
> failures in build.
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 1:24 AM, Brian Aker <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> In trunk we had a regression that was flagged in valgrind in later
> runs. I've pointed out to Andrew which patch it was and I have
> applied a reverse patch on top of the tree in order to save us from
> having to deal with a bad trunk.
>
> I've pushed through the rename on three DD tables. In staging is
> field work/uuid. In build is Monty's error patches with a couple of
> concurrent fixes I found in the logging_stat tests. I am hoping that
> in the morning:
> 1) uuid is finished and good to push to trunk.
> 2) No issues showed up with monty's tests. I run the logging tests
> with --mem and --repeat=10 in order to see if anything would show up.
>
> Cheers,
> -Brian
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-merge
> <https://launchpad.net/%7Edrizzle-merge>
> Post to : drizzle-merge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:drizzle-merge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-merge
> <https://launchpad.net/%7Edrizzle-merge>
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>
Follow ups
References