← Back to team overview

drizzle-merge team mailing list archive

Re: Current state

 

I'm guessing the failure is related to the flush that brian added (which
was a great idea, btw) I could fix it with a record, but I'm not sure
that's 100% the right move?

On 12/16/2010 07:53 AM, Lee Bieber wrote:
> I've pushed staging to trunk, however Monty you will need to look at the
> failures in build.
> 
> 
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 1:24 AM, Brian Aker <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> 
>     Hi!
> 
>     In trunk we had a regression that was flagged in valgrind in later
>     runs. I've pointed out to Andrew which patch it was and I have
>     applied a reverse patch on top of the tree in order to save us from
>     having to deal with a bad trunk.
> 
>     I've pushed through the rename on three DD tables. In staging is
>     field work/uuid. In build is Monty's error patches with a couple of
>     concurrent fixes I found in the logging_stat tests. I am hoping that
>     in the morning:
>     1) uuid is finished and good to push to trunk.
>     2) No issues showed up with monty's tests. I run the logging tests
>     with --mem and --repeat=10 in order to see if anything would show up.
> 
>     Cheers,
>            -Brian
>     _______________________________________________
>     Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-merge
>     <https://launchpad.net/%7Edrizzle-merge>
>     Post to     : drizzle-merge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>     <mailto:drizzle-merge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>     Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-merge
>     <https://launchpad.net/%7Edrizzle-merge>
>     More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> 
> 




Follow ups

References