duplicity-team team mailing list archive
-
duplicity-team team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #02323
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Python 2.6.0 testing
-
To:
duplicity-team <duplicity-team@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-
From:
edgar.soldin@xxxxxx
-
Date:
Mon, 19 May 2014 14:52:13 +0200
-
In-reply-to:
<CAD-_Ma2=HRdf4jCXZaVEctVzPhdrRnn0jocG4h=0nmS4zUzzAg@mail.gmail.com>
-
User-agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
try a full and then an incremental.. that's where it dies reproducably for me.. see thread ;) .. ede
On 19.05.2014 14:50, Kenneth Loafman wrote:
> BTW, webdav(s) works to rsync.net <http://rsync.net>, for me, on 0.7.
>
>
> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 7:38 AM, <edgar.soldin@xxxxxx <mailto:edgar.soldin@xxxxxx>> wrote:
>
> this was off-topic.. again webdav related which makes sense on the list. time for a new thread i guess.
> i agree wrt. testing though.. ede
>
> On 19.05.2014 13:24, Kenneth Loafman wrote:
> > They all get filed somewhere.
> >
> > We started with duplicity-team and this is not a topic that would hold a lot of interest for the general user.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 6:16 AM, <edgar.soldin@xxxxxx <mailto:edgar.soldin@xxxxxx> <mailto:edgar.soldin@xxxxxx <mailto:edgar.soldin@xxxxxx>>> wrote:
> >
> > any reason why not to file it in the public archives? ..ede
> >
> > On 19.05.2014 13:13, Kenneth Loafman wrote:
> > > Just moving the discussion back to duplicity-team.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Michael Terry <mike@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxxx> <mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxxx>> <mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxxx> <mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxxx>>>> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 18 May 2014 13:29, <edgar.soldin@xxxxxx <mailto:edgar.soldin@xxxxxx> <mailto:edgar.soldin@xxxxxx <mailto:edgar.soldin@xxxxxx>> <mailto:edgar.soldin@xxxxxx <mailto:edgar.soldin@xxxxxx> <mailto:edgar.soldin@xxxxxx <mailto:edgar.soldin@xxxxxx>>>> wrote:
> > >
> > > manual duplicity works on full, collection-status but fails on incremental call
> > >
> > >
> > > Noted.
> > >
> > >
> > > > The second error there looks similar, in the sense that a get() call failed to download the file. I've seen bugs filed against 0.6.x that look similar.
> > > >
> > >
> > > don't believe it to be a lingering bug from 0.6
> > > this is reproducable only with 0.7 branch against an account that i can use properly w/ 0.6.x , reproducably ;P
> > >
> > >
> > > My brain was thinking of bugs 1177381 and 710198. But yeah, this error is different.
> > >
> > > I'll have a look later.
> > >
> > > -mt
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Duplicity-talk mailing list
> > > Duplicity-talk@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:Duplicity-talk@xxxxxxxxxx> <mailto:Duplicity-talk@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:Duplicity-talk@xxxxxxxxxx>> <mailto:Duplicity-talk@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:Duplicity-talk@xxxxxxxxxx> <mailto:Duplicity-talk@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:Duplicity-talk@xxxxxxxxxx>>>
> > > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~duplicity-team <https://launchpad.net/%7Eduplicity-team>
> Post to : duplicity-team@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:duplicity-team@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~duplicity-team <https://launchpad.net/%7Eduplicity-team>
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>
References