← Back to team overview

elementary-dev-community team mailing list archive

Re: Luna +1's Name and Some Other Stuff

 

I forgot to add the link:

https://github.com/rastersoft/autovala

El 25/08/13 15:11, Sergio Costas escribió:
About CMake, remember that I created autovala, that greatly simplifies working with CMake and managing projects.

In fact, as soon as I end a little project I'm into, I want to add to it conditional compilation.

El 25/08/13 14:36, Craig escribió:
" So I'd probably start off by getting rid of all the technical debt we
might have accumulated in the race to release and getting some tools to
manage the increased complexity we're facing, e.g. unifying the way CMake works, providing better code documentation, adding some automated testing,
etc."

I'm so proud I could cry. *tear*. I support this message.
On Aug 25, 2013 6:49 AM, "Sergey "Shnatsel" Davidoff" <
sergey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Yay, bike shedding! Wait for me!

AFAIR the original plan was to use gods from the same pantheon for any
given series, Roman for the 0.x series specifically, hence the name of the
DE - Pantheon. So I looked for suitable Roman deities and I think I've
found a great one.

Continuing the trend, she's a Roman deity and has a celestial body in the
Solar system named after her. What's more, according to a myth that was
very widespread in late antiquity, she eventually moved to Egypt and became
Isis!

Behold Io! The Roman Isis that comes with a celestial body and a domain
name hack!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Io_%28mythology%29
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Io_%28moon%29

By the way, turns out http://elementary.io is already registered by
Cassidy and currently redirects to elementaryos.org, so I feel like this
was the plan all along.

As for development, we have ~8 months till release, so this is going to be
an iterative cycle. We're obviously not going for Wayland or Mir or
anything equally new and fancy because that technology is not yet baked and will not be on par with the time-proven base by 14.04. It does look like
we'll have another huge migration on our hands after that, though.

So I'd probably start off by getting rid of all the technical debt we
might have accumulated in the race to release and getting some tools to
manage the increased complexity we're facing, e.g. unifying the way CMake works, providing better code documentation, adding some automated testing,
etc.

Next, since we're making an iterative cycle, I'd stop acting and start
reacting. Like, make a list of things that people have trouble with in Luna and fix them. I have compiled an [incomplete] list of gripes people seem to have with Luna. Maybe we should run some user testing and see what causes
issues?

We can't afford organized user testing, but we could reach out to the
community - say, provide people with testing methodology and ask people who spread elementary OS to carry out the testing and send in the results. Like run a user testing sprint to identify the issues the target audience has,
and fix them. Sounds like a plan!

Long live Io!

--
Sergey "Shnatsel" Davidoff
OS architect @ elementary

--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~elementary-dev-community
Post to     : elementary-dev-community@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~elementary-dev-community
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp








--
Nos leemos
		         RASTER    (Linux user #228804)
raster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx              http://www.rastersoft.com



Follow ups

References