erma-core team mailing list archive

["Stephen Mullins" <smullins7@xxxxxxxxx>]

ok I'll add a src tar and a src zip.  should we add a binary tar and a
binary zip too?

On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Doug Barth <dougbarth@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Nice! Looks like we got the emails this time too, so that's good.
>
> I changed the naming of the series and milestones you created to follow the
> lead of the bzr project. They make series based on the point release that
> they are shipping (eg. 1.2, 2.1) and they make releases under that series
> for RCs, patch releases and the actual official release (eg, 1.2, 1.2.1
> 2.1-rc3). Since that approach goes pretty well with our process, I thought
> it best to follow their lead.
>
> One addition to the release process, I have seen as least a couple people
> express interest in a tar-ed or zipped up version of the source being
> release alongside the binaries. Can we add that? We may always want to
> consider whether we should post individual JARs to the site or a tar/zipball
> with the binary jars and their dependent artifacts.
>
> --
> Doug
>
>
> On Aug 12, 2008, at 12:55 PM, Stephen Mullins wrote:
>
>  I resubmitted the proposal.
>>
>> Also, I made a series, a milestone, a release, and then i was able to
>> upload an rc version of our first binaries!  Greg had reviewed the refactor
>> stream so I pushed it to the trunk.  I feel kinda lost going through these
>> steps so I'd like us to iron out a procedure for additional
>> branches/reviews/releases.  Either way, we have our first binaries out there
>> :)
>>
>> I thought there would be balloons and champaigne for that but oh well.
>>
>