fenics team mailing list archive

[Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 10:16:29AM -0600, Ridgway Scott wrote:
> >I don't think it is necessary for all projects to be "pure FEM" codes.
> 
> FEniCS should be about how scientific codes are written, and
> a repository for artifacts used in writing codes. So instant
> seems to fit within this definition to me.
> 
> It can also be featured at sourceforge; I don't see a conflict,
> just an extra burden to keep two sites up to date. The more
> exposure, the more likely it will be that people will learn
> about it and learn how to use it.
> 
> 				Ridg

I agree.

Any further comments/objections?

/Anders