fenics team mailing list archive

["Garth N. Wells" <g.n.wells@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Anders Logg wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 10:16:29AM -0600, Ridgway Scott wrote:
> > > I don't think it is necessary for all projects to be "pure FEM" codes.
> > FEniCS should be about how scientific codes are written, and
> > a repository for artifacts used in writing codes. So instant
> > seems to fit within this definition to me.
> >
> > It can also be featured at sourceforge; I don't see a conflict,
> > just an extra burden to keep two sites up to date. The more
> > exposure, the more likely it will be that people will learn
> > about it and learn how to use it.
> >
> > 				Ridg
>
> I agree.
>
> Any further comments/objections?

No problems.

Garth

> /Anders
> _______________________________________________
> FEniCS-dev mailing list
> FEniCS-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics-dev