fenics team mailing list archive

["Johan Hoffman" <jhoffman@xxxxxxxxxx>]

> On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 10:16:29AM -0600, Ridgway Scott wrote:
>> >I don't think it is necessary for all projects to be "pure FEM" codes.
>>
>> FEniCS should be about how scientific codes are written, and
>> a repository for artifacts used in writing codes. So instant
>> seems to fit within this definition to me.
>>
>> It can also be featured at sourceforge; I don't see a conflict,
>> just an extra burden to keep two sites up to date. The more
>> exposure, the more likely it will be that people will learn
>> about it and learn how to use it.
>>
>> 				Ridg
>
> I agree.
>
> Any further comments/objections?
>
> /Anders

I have no objections.

/Johan




> _______________________________________________
> FEniCS-dev mailing list
> FEniCS-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics-dev
>